gofri Why two g's? When I was a kid my grandma called me Gofri, and the family picked it up. She said the G hard, almost twice, so I write it twice.
production

Engineering manager

for
Ticmas
when
2024
Problem
Two teams and a stakeholder gap.
My contribution
Proposed merging teams and a stakeholder squad with product, sales and content leadership.
Delivered
Managed 15 direct reports (1 QA, 2 designers, 12 developers), Apr–Nov 2024. Developed and sponsored two official Staff promotions.
Result
Managed a merged team of 15 and sponsored two official Staff promotions.
Status
production · 2024

15direct reports in the merged team, Apr–Nov 2024

Product-based learning team
Curricular team

no shared way to manage demand

  • product
  • sales
  • content
one team · 15
1 QA
2 designers
12 developers
  • product
  • sales
  • content

a stakeholder squad with product, sales and content leadership

Two teams and a gap, then one team and a stakeholder squadreconstruction, illustrative

demand

Capacity first, then what to say yes to

  1. 1Capacity and prioritiesI established what the team could carry and set quarterly priorities, so requests stopped arriving without a way to weigh them.
  2. 2A new format mid-migrationContent leadership wanted a new format during a migration under a budget constraint. I deferred the full implementation to the next quarter.
  3. 3A spike in the meantimeI offered myself and one engineer for a preparatory spike and design, and negotiated the tradeoff with commercial and product stakeholders.
  4. 4Standards delegatedFrontend standards went to a Staff reference, who presented them to the team.

promotions

Two Staff promotions, with the Head of Engineering

  • Two official Staff promotionsI developed and sponsored them, with level and compensation changes after calibration.
  • ApprovalThe Head of Engineering retained final approval.

limits

Team authority is not business authority

Decisions needed agreement across product, commercial, engineering and content. I led the team, not those decisions alone. There is no quantified effect of the merge itself.

ownership

Who did what, and when

  1. tech leadproposed the merge
  2. merged teamApr 2024
  3. engineering manager15 direct reports
  4. two Staff promotions
  • MeProposed the merge; managed staffing, 1:1s, performance, budget and promotions
  • Head of EngineeringApproved staffing, budget and promotions
  • Product, sales and content leadershipJoined the stakeholder squad; shared the decisions
  • A Staff referenceOwned frontend standards and presented them to the team
  • Merge effectNot measured

What shipped

A merged team of 15, and two official Staff promotions.

Head of Engineering approval; no quantified effect of the merge
  • Managed 15 direct reports in the merged team, Apr–Nov 2024: one QA, two designers and twelve developers.
  • Two official Staff promotions, with level and compensation changes.
Method and caveats

Team composition is my own account; there are no personnel records.

  • Team composition: my own account; there are no personnel records
  • Promotions: final approval stayed with the Head of Engineering
  • No quantified effect of the merge is claimed